Sun TV CEO Saxena & Ayyappan did NOT say they morphed the Video - NithyLies Again

Sun TV CEO Saxena & Ayyappan did NOT say they morphed the Video - More Nithyananda NithyLies

From extensive research into both sides of the Nithyananda allegations I have found that something is consistent, that is the Nithyananda propaganda machine frequently takes something, often in another language and uses it to promote a belief amongst the devot

ees that it at best without foundation and usually completely infactual.
One such example I have seen frequently touted by devotees is that Sun TV admitted to morphing the video. If that was true, it would indeed be something, although of course money and threats in India buy a lot of statements.
However, in this instance it does not require any bribery, it just requires a complete distortion of what was actually said.
Videos such as this one Nithyananda Ranjitha Video Morphed Saxena confession ex by Truth Bug is one such video used to deceive ignorant English speakers.
Curiously Truth Bug only ever uploaded this one video, and is obviously pro Nithyananda to the point of blatant dishonest bias in the video title.
I was go as far as to suggest that most of the pro Nithyananda commenters of the video are English only speakers and simply believing the dishonestly provided title.
Fortunately a native speaker has kindly provided the transcript to this video which certainly does not say that the video was morphed.

At the most the comments may indict ones within Sun TV of being corrupt, however, not a bit of evidence is given to support this allegation either.

The speaker actually indicated that the video is more likely GENUINE. He did this by confirming that he knew the woman in the video was the actress Ranjitha, who had vehemently denied it was her in the video to the point of making (false) statements and criminal charges against Lenin.

The speaker also indicated that Kalanithi wanted honest journalism by saying "Kalanithi had told him to release it after making sure it was genuine".

'Srinivasan, who had done the graphics for the film Yenthiran was asked him to give it in writing that the CD was genuine. He was not prepared to give this assurance.'

Personally I do not blame him. He could make a best guess it was genuine, but he certainly is not certified as a forensics expert and even if he was, unless he had access to the original media and recording equipment, it would be impossible to make such an assurance. The original media as NOT a CD. Therefore as it is clear the discussion is about a CD, there is no way he had access to the original media, let alone the actual recording equipment.

As such Srinivasin is not confirming that the CD was genuine is NOT in any way indicative of saying that the CD is morphed.

It seems that the biggest issue after reading the transcript was that the persons concerned were not familiar enough with Nithyananda to be able to confirm if it was or was not him. Again this is not even near saying the video is morphed.

I could show you a video of two people and tell you one of the persons is Bill Bloggs. Give me an assurance that it is Bill Bloggs in the video. Of course you cannot do it. And that is what seems to be indicated by the transcript.

Additionally, Saxena, the speaker is on the defensive due to the extensive propaganda being put other by Nithyananda organisations and devotees claiming the video to be morphed, naturally he is trying to protect himself, and IF there is any chance the video is morphed, push the blame elsewhere. For anyone who has been in the corporate world they would know that it is unfortunately common for managers and bosses to take the glory when things work out well but push the blame at the slightest hint they may be under scrutiny. It is not moral, but it is common.

Thus to infer, let alone outright state, that the statements by Sun TV CEO Saxena prove that the video is morphed is completely dishonest and fraudulent. To do so within an alleged spiritual or religious group context is reflective of a complete lack of spirituality.

If Nithyananda devotees actually did their due diligence and properly and fully checked the propagandising claims put out by the organisation before they blindly relayed them, the entire organisation would quickly fall apart as the veil of lies is lifted.

For reference I have provided a couple of the comments to this video.

Comments

Shraddha Goswami

Actually, this video doesn't say that the video was morphed, it only says that the authenticity was not proven. Transcript here: 

"When I had been to Dubai for the holidays, there was a CD (compact disc) that had come addressed to the manager. 

My assistant Jyotheeswaran has put the CD and seen it. He did not know who the people in the CD were. He has shown that CD to the Manager Kannan. 

He knew that the person in the CD was Ranjitha. But he did not know who the man was. 

Kannan spoke to me on cell phone and communicated to me that a CD like this has come. I did not pay attention to it. That CD has reached Sun TV News Editor Raja. 

He has shown it to Kalanithi and told him that the people involved are Nithyananda and Ranjitha and said that , ‘We will tear them apart’ by putting in on the TV. 

Kalanithi had told him to release it after making sure it was genuine. Raja showed the CD to Srinivasan, who had done the graphics for the film ‘Yenthiran’ and asked him to give it in writing that the CD was genuine. 

Srinivasan has refused to give it. In my life I have not even seen Nithyananda. 

But they correlated this matter with me and got me caught. I know how Sun TV Raja got crores and crores of rupees worth assets. In making money Raja’s style itself is very unique. Sewage water is flowing; so disease is spreading, he will milk the factory owners of lakhs of rupees. In relation to Sun TV there are many matters. I will inform of everything continuously."

Madhava Shri

This video is not fake. Just because the CEO of SUN TV has said that it is morphed, means nothing. You can make anyone say anything with a combination of money and threats. Just how exactly is it morphed? There is nothing morphed about it, it may be edited, all videos are edited, morphing means putting someone else's face over someone else's body and that's not been done here. Any editor can tell you that. INfact, when this video first came out, Nithy did NOT say it wasn't him, he said it was 'misrepresented'. Accounts of people like Rajiv Malhotra who interviewed him at that time make it abundantly clear. All Nithy followers swear by Rajiv Malhotra, and yet ignore what he had first written in 2010. I quote: "Another approach for him could have been to announce himself as an experimenter of Tantra for modern times, thereby making himself transparent of any such charges. This would place him in the same category as Osho. Many times in his public discourses and teachings, he has praised Osho as his greatest teacher and enlightened exemplar. He even said that many of his own teachings were derived from Osho. But he failed to publicly clarify whether he was practicing those techniques that involve sex. Privately, he explained to me in recent days that Shiva Sutras have two categories of techniques. Most of the sutras donot involve physical contact with another person and only use the four senses of sight, sound, taste and smell as pathways to spiritual experiences. Hence an individual practices these techniques entirely on his/her own. This path is what he has taught thus far to the public. The best pursuit of this path is as a brahamacharya according to him, and he has initiated many followers into it. But for a small number of persons, he feels that the 6 sutras involving sexual Tantra need to be tested and perfected for modern times, before they can be safely taught more widely. This he considers like any R & D done in a lab for developing a product. My sense is that he did practice Tantra with a very small number of persons, and I believe that he even entered into written legal contracts with them to make sure that both parties were clear about the arrangement. The reason for this Non-Disclosure Agreement wasto make sure that someone who willingly approaches him for Tantra does not later accuse him of physical contact. On March 9 (about a week ago), I did a specific video interview with him dealing with this issue very specifically. But this video was blocked by his ashram leaders even though he personally felt that it was a good idea to show it. I gave up arguing in favor of showing it, because his ashram management took a firm stand against it. I still feel that this was a blunder they made. Swami Nithyananda is very forthright and clear in that interview I felt that it was the best interview of all the ones I did with him, but it was never made public. I surmise that Rancitha, the Tamil actress in the scandalous videotape, was practicing Tantra with him. He taught her the self-control she had to achieve before any intimacy. I have tried to interview her in order to get her side of the story, but so far I have not succeeded in getting through to her. Based on third party reports from some persons who are in touch with her, and the media reports of her statements, her stance seems to be along the following lines: She took the sexual initiative with him on the occasion shown in the videotape, at a time when he was not fully alert. But this activity did not proceed to intercourse. It was terminated. She has also said that the videos being shown on TV are manipulated versions of what actually happened, because they exaggerate the situation. They do not show portions where he asked her to stop. Different clips from various videos seem to have been turned into a single video by editing. " THIS IS WHAT HE WROTE. AFTER ALL THE INTERVIEWS AND MEETINGS WITH NITHY AT THAT TIME , IF HE WAS TOLD THAT THE VIDEO WAS FAKE, THAT IS WHAT HE WOULD HAVE SAID AT THAT TIME - "ladies and gentlemen, I asked, the video is fake." BUT NO, HE DIDNT SAY THAT. HE CAME UP WITH THIS NUANCED POST. DON'T FOOL YOURSELVES. NOW THIS POST IS NO LONGER ON HIS BLOG. WHY? THESE ARE RAJIV MALHOTRA'S OWN WORDS.DID HE LIE ABOUT THE CONTRACT? IF THE VIDEO WAS FAKE, HOW DID HE COME TO THESE CONCLUSIONS WHICH SOUND LIKE THE VIDEO WAS TRUE. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH NITHY PRACTISING TANTRA, BUT I HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM THAT SOMEBODY WHO CALLS HIMSELF AN INCARNATION OF SHIVA, LIES!!!! OFCOURSE HE HAS SIDDHIS, THAT DOESN"T MAKE HIM GOD! HE MAY BE A GOOD TEACHER, THAT STILL DOESN'T MAKE HIM GOD. HE MAYBE ABLE TO AROUS KUNDALINI AND HEAL AND GIVE PEOPLE ACCESS TO POWERS, THAT STILL DOES NOT MAKE HIM GOD. YES, NITHY WAS ATTACKED BY PAID MEDIA. YES, IT WAS A PLANNED THING. THAT DOESN'T MEAN EVERYTHING WAS A LIE. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH HIM HAVING PHYSICAL CONTACT OR PRACTISING TANTRA. BUT HE NEEDS TO BE HONEST. OTHERWISE HE IS JUST FOOLING PEOPLE AND HIS DEVOTEES.